Panamanian President Jose Raul Mulino has sanctioned a major overhaul of the nation’s legal profession regulations. The new law, known as Law 500 of 2025, establishes stricter requirements for becoming a practicing lawyer and imposes harsh penalties for the illegal practice of law. This legislative action concluded a political standoff after the National Assembly of Panama approved the bill by insistence, overriding a presidential veto.
The legal document, contained in Bill 168 of 2025, introduces substantial changes to the professional fitness certification process. These reforms directly impact how new lawyers qualify for practice, centralize examination authority, and address unauthorized legal activities. The law’s passage signals a significant shift in the country’s approach to legal credentialing and professional standards.
New Pathways to Legal Practice
Law 500 modifies Article 2 of the existing 2022 regulations. The updated statute mandates that the Supreme Court of Justice of Panama may only grant professional fitness certification to candidates who meet specific criteria. Applicants must be Panamanian nationals and hold a law degree from an authorized university within the country.
For degrees obtained abroad, the law requires revalidation by the University of Panama, though international agreements may provide exceptions. Beyond these foundational requirements, aspiring lawyers must fulfill one of three additional conditions to demonstrate their competency and commitment to the profession.
Candidates can either pass a professional entrance examination, publish a thesis in an indexed legal journal, or complete one month of voluntary service in judicial offices, prosecutor’s offices, or public entities providing legal advice. This multifaceted approach aims to create diverse pathways into the legal field while maintaining high standards.
The law represents our commitment to enhancing the quality and integrity of legal services in Panama, [Translated from Spanish]
Centralized Examination Authority
The legislation grants exclusive authority to administer the professional entrance examination to the Faculty of Law and Political Science at the University of Panama. This centralization represents a significant consolidation of testing procedures across the country’s legal education system. The university must develop a unified curriculum in coordination with other institutions that offer law degrees.
Administrative timelines are clearly defined within the new framework. The institution has precisely one month from receiving a candidate’s documents to schedule the examination date. A minimum passing score will be established, though specific benchmarks have not yet been publicly disclosed. This structured timeline aims to create predictability for recent graduates navigating the certification process.
Strengthened Enforcement and Penalties
Law 500 repeals Article 5 of the previous Law 350, eliminating prior provisions governing professional practice. The updated legislation notably strengthens consequences for public servants who enable or permit the illegal practice of law. These enhanced penalties target systemic vulnerabilities that previously allowed unauthorized legal activities to persist.
Article 9 establishes clear disciplinary measures for violations. Any public official who acts as a legal representative or advisor without proper certification, or who permits a third party to practice illegally, faces an immediate thirty-day suspension for a first offense. Dismissal from position becomes the mandatory consequence for any repeated violation of these provisions.
The same sanctions apply to public servants who refuse to accept representation from a properly certified lawyer without valid justification. This provision prevents bureaucratic obstruction against qualified legal professionals while ensuring citizens can access legitimate legal representation when interacting with government agencies.
Political Context and Implementation
The law’s approval followed an unusual legislative process that tested the balance of power between government branches. President Mulino had initially vetoed the proposed legislation, returning it to the National Assembly with specific objections. Legislators then exercised their constitutional authority to pass the bill by insistence, effectively overriding the executive branch’s concerns.
This political maneuver left the version approved in the third legislative debate as the final text. The law takes effect immediately following its official promulgation. Legal experts anticipate the reforms will transform Panama’s legal landscape, potentially raising professional standards while creating new barriers to entry for aspiring lawyers.
The coming months will reveal how these structural changes impact legal education, professional development, and public access to justice throughout Panama. University administrators and judicial officials now face the practical challenge of implementing these comprehensive reforms across the nation’s legal system.

